In response to a question - here are the two other trials of post op RT for Prostate Cancer referred to in the last post
Wiegel ASCO 2005 (abstract only)
•385 s/p RP, pT3N0, undetectable PSA
–60 Gy post op RT to prostate bed
–NFT
•If PSA detectable, 66Gy postop RT (20%of patients entered)
•32 in RT arm did not receive RT (21% of arm)
•39 mo follow up
•Per protocol: bRFS (4) 81% with RT, 60% NFT (p<0.001)
•Intention to treat: bRFS (4) ~75% with RT, 60% NFT (SS)
Grade II rectal toxicity 3%•1,005 Patients underwent RP, node negative with + margins, + ECE, or SVI.
•Randomized to
–50Gy + 10Gy boost to bed
–Close observation (NFT)
•Mean f/u 5 years
•90% had PSA <0.2
•bPFS (5) 74% RT vs 53% NFT (p<0.001)
•Clinical Failure (5) 8.8% RT vs 19.0% NFT (p=0.009)
•No difference in OS or Distant Failures
•Grade 1-2 toxicity 45%NFT vs 60%RT (SS)
•Grade 3 toxicity ~4% for both (NS)
No comments:
Post a Comment